Community Policing Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

confederacy Policing - Research Paper ExampleWithin the broad sphere of public administration, there is a need for administrators to understand how to better function in the public sector. Where service-oriented exercise is the watchword, and no visible product is offered as a measure of successful productivity, it becomes incumbent upon the administrator to stir a concerted effort to evaluate service and citizen impact on that service. This seems to be a unplayful fit with the reinventing government concept of the 1990s where there was a greater emphasis on node service by public administrators to treat the customer right (Bach, 2009). In the field of law enforcement, it is pressing that successful administrators make every effort to foster a cooperative liaison with the (customer) citizenry. Citizen cooperation will have the constabulary force- club alliance. Needs loafer be identified, and efforts to meet those needs can be addressed by citizens and constabulary administ rators alike. This attitude of cooperative appraisal of needs fits well into the model of residential area policing (Tilley, 2010). Community Policing Police offices that grew tabu of the reform era (patrol serve, rapid response to calls, etc.) may nearlytimes lead to roadblocks. These more traditional police practices sometimes encounter a public paradox (Radelet & Carter, 1994). The paradox states that discourtesy control functions collide with callable process ideals, in that citizens recognize the need for a social contract (a need for police) that occasionally can run counter to the basic freedom that they seek. So, this conflict (or paradox) between the need for police and the desire for the safeguard of due process can remain between police and the public (Radelet & Carter, 1994). The winds of change are travel through the hallways of many police organizations in America. For some, these winds are like a summer breeze that opens the adit to new possibilities. For ot hers, they signal the onset of a cold, uncertain winter. Regardless of how one experiences it, something is happening, and this something is an attempt to rethink and restructure the role of police in society (Rosenbaum in Bordeur, 1998 p.1). Inability of existing police infrastructures to cope with greater than ever complexities of our fast changing society and increasing demands on police by their rapidly ripening constituencies forces police organizations to look for new ways to serve their communities (Tilley, 2010). Increased bureaucratization and over- specialization of police forces and separation from the community amplifies the need for implementing a community-driven police force. Police organizations face increased costs and pressure from the community and involution groups to do more with fewer resources. As a consequence, police administrators are forced to cut some services in order to address priority needs (Tilley, 2010). Reduction and elimination of police servic es due to budget cuts and increasing operational costs creates community discontent. A new cost competent approach to prevent and deal with crime is needed in order to cover eliminated services. Community point policing is recognized as a viable solution to reducing crime and efficiently solving community problems (Chacko & Nancoo, 1993). Murphy labels proactive policing as the dominant ideology and organization mode of progressive policing (Murphy, in Chacko & Nancoo, 1993, p. 1). Community policing philosophy and research suggests traditional bureaucratic, crime-attack policing has failed. The police have lost their community context and this loss inhibits the police in their order maintenance and crime control functions (Tilley, 2010). Critics of traditional policing argue, police are mystifying their role and manipulating public expectation. Reactive policing promotes poor policing management, leading to the issuance of more traffic tickets, the growth of an unofficial quota s ystem, and fudging of crime statistics (Thibault, Lynch, & McBride 1985, p. 50).